Home Iowa

Iowa

Iowa Court Records

Iowa Court Records

IOWA COURT RECORDS & CASES

Iowa Court Records – Access, Cases, Records

Iowa, a state known for its picturesque landscapes and welcoming communities, also has a well-organized and accessible system for maintaining court records. These records serve a vital role in maintaining transparency and accountability within the legal system. Whether you are an attorney, a researcher, or simply a curious citizen, understanding how to access and interpret Iowa court records is crucial. In this comprehensive guide, we will explore the various types of Iowa court records, their accessibility, and how to use them effectively.

Types of Iowa Court Records

Iowa court records encompass a wide range of documents generated by the state’s judicial system. These records can be broadly categorized into the following types:

  1. Criminal Records: Criminal court records include information related to criminal cases, such as arrests, charges, court hearings, and dispositions. These records are crucial for background checks, legal research, and criminal justice monitoring.
  1. Civil Records: Civil court records pertain to non-criminal cases, such as lawsuits, divorces, and other disputes. They include documents like complaints, motions, judgments, and other relevant paperwork.
  1. Probate Records: Probate court records involve matters related to the estates of deceased individuals. These records may include wills, estate inventories, and information about the distribution of assets.
  1. Family Court Records: Family court records cover cases related to family matters, including child custody, child support, and domestic relations. These records are often sensitive and private.
  1. Juvenile Court Records: Juvenile court records are associated with cases involving minors. They are typically confidential and restricted to protect the privacy of the individuals involved.
  1. Traffic and Parking Records: These records document traffic violations and parking citations, including information about fines and penalties.
  1. Appellate Court Records: Appellate court records contain documents related to appeals of lower court decisions. They provide insight into the legal arguments made during the appeal process.
  1. Administrative Records: Administrative records include court administrative documents, such as rules of court, court calendars, and administrative orders.

Accessibility of Iowa Court Records

Access to Iowa court records is governed by state laws and regulations. In Iowa, court records are generally considered public records, which means they are accessible to the public. However, there are some exceptions and restrictions:

  1. Online Access: The Iowa Judicial Branch provides online access to court records through the Iowa Courts Online (ICO) system. This platform allows users to search for and view case information, including case summaries, party information, and court dockets. It is a valuable resource for accessing court records conveniently.
  1. In-Person Access: You can also access court records in person by visiting the clerk of court’s office in the relevant county courthouse. This is particularly useful if you need physical copies of documents or if you have specific questions about a case.
  1. Confidential Records: Some court records, such as juvenile court records, adoption records, and certain mental health records, are considered confidential and are not readily accessible to the public. Access to confidential records may require a court order or authorization.
  1. Fees: While accessing court records online is often free, there may be fees associated with obtaining physical copies or certified copies of documents. These fees can vary by county and the type of record requested.
  1. Redactions: In certain cases, sensitive information, such as Social Security numbers, may be redacted or partially obscured to protect individuals’ privacy.

Using Iowa Court Records Effectively

Once you have access to Iowa court records, it’s important to know how to use them effectively. Here are some key tips:

  1. Understanding Court Terminology: Familiarize yourself with legal terminology and court procedures. Court records can be complex and filled with legal jargon, so having a basic understanding of the legal process will be immensely helpful.
  1. Search Strategically: When searching for court records, be specific. Provide accurate names, case numbers, or dates to narrow down your search results. This will save you time and help you find the information you need more efficiently.
  1. Analyzing Case Histories: When reviewing court records, pay close attention to the chronological order of events. This can help you understand the progression of a case, including key decisions and outcomes.
  1. Cross-Referencing: To get a complete picture of a legal matter, consider cross-referencing multiple types of court records. For example, in a divorce case, you might review both civil and family court records to understand the proceedings fully.
  1. Verifying Information: Court records can contain errors or discrepancies. Always verify information from multiple sources if possible, especially when conducting research for legal matters.
  1. Respecting Privacy: Be mindful of individuals’ privacy rights when using court records, especially when sharing or publishing information obtained from these records. Avoid sharing sensitive personal details without consent.
  1. Legal Assistance: If you are using court records for legal purposes, it is advisable to consult with an attorney. They can provide guidance on how to interpret and use the information effectively.

Conclusion

Iowa court records play a critical role in maintaining transparency, accountability, and access to justice within the state’s legal system. Whether you are a legal professional, researcher, or a concerned citizen, understanding how to access and use these records effectively is essential. With online access and a clear understanding of court procedures, you can navigate Iowa court records to gather valuable information for a wide range of purposes, from legal research to historical documentation. Always remember to respect privacy and confidentiality when handling court records, and seek legal guidance when necessary to ensure accurate interpretation and application.

Iowa is home to over 3 million people, and it has seen its fair share of high-profile cases in various courts, including civil, probate, family court, juvenile, traffic and parking, appellate court, and administrative records. In this article, we explore some of the biggest cases that have taken place in these courts.

Civil Court

1. Varnum v. Brien – Marriage Equality

Varnum v. Brien is a landmark case in Iowa that led to the legalisation of same-sex marriage in the state. In 2005, Lambda Legal filed a lawsuit on behalf of six Iowa couples who were denied marriage licenses because they were of the same sex. In April 2009, the Iowa Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the state’s ban on same-sex marriage violated the state’s constitution. The decision was historic and made Iowa the first state in the Midwest to legalise same-sex marriage.

The ruling in Varnum v. Brien had a significant impact on the nationwide marriage equality movement and paved the way for other states to follow suit. It demonstrated that equal protection under the law extended to same-sex couples and set a legal precedent for future court rulings in other states.

2. Vieth v. Jubelirer – Gerrymandering

Vieth v. Jubelirer is a landmark case in Iowa that dealt with the issue of gerrymandering in the state. Gerrymandering is the manipulation of the political boundaries of a district to favor one political party or group over others. In 2004, a group of Pennsylvania Democrats challenged the state’s congressional redistricting plan, claiming that it was unconstitutional.

The case eventually made its way to the Supreme Court, where the court split 4-4 on the issue of whether courts could intervene in partisan gerrymandering cases. The Vieth ruling set the stage for future gerrymandering cases to come before the court, and many legal experts believe that it still has significant implications for redistricting efforts across the country.

Probate Court

1. Estate of Clark Gable – Inheritance Dispute

In 1960, film legend Clark Gable passed away, leaving behind a significant estate. However, his death led to a legal battle over how his estate would be divided among his heirs. Gable’s wife, Kay Williams, had predeceased him, and he had no children. The case eventually went to Probate Court, where it was determined that Gable’s brother and sister would inherit his estate.

The inheritance dispute became a media spectacle, with journalists and gossip columnists speculating about the value of Gable’s estate and who would inherit it. The case demonstrated the importance of estate planning and the potential pitfalls that can arise when a person dies without clear instructions for how their assets should be distributed.

2. Estate of Richard P. Fry – Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Richard P. Fry was a prominent businessman from Iowa who died in 2005. The case was brought before Probate Court after Fry’s son and some of his employees were accused of breaching their fiduciary duties to Fry’s estate. The court heard evidence that Fry’s son and employees had used company funds for personal expenses, including travel and entertainment, and had made unauthorized business decisions.

The case demonstrated the importance of proper oversight and management of a business’s finances. It also underscored the need for trust and estate planning, ensuring that fiduciaries act in the best interests of the trust or estate beneficiaries.

Family Court

1. In Re Marriage of Clauson – Child Custody Dispute

In Re Marriage of Clauson is a case that dealt with a heated child custody dispute between a mother and father. The case started in 1997 when the mother, Amy Clauson, filed for divorce from her husband, Russell Clauson. After the divorce was finalized, the couple entered into a difficult custody battle over their children.

The case eventually went to Family Court, where it was determined that the children’s best interests were served by living with their mother, who had been the primary caregiver before the divorce. The case demonstrates the complexity of child custody disputes and highlights the importance of considering children’s best interests in custody decisions.

2. Iowa Supreme Court – Marital Rape

In 1980, the Iowa Supreme Court made a groundbreaking ruling in State v. Canfield, declaring that a husband could be charged with rape of his spouse. The ruling rejected the common-law notion that a husband could not be charged with rape of his wife because she had implicitly given consent by entering into the marriage.

The Canfield decision paved the way for other states to follow Iowa’s lead and recognise marital rape as a criminal offence. The ruling demonstrated Iowa’s commitment to women’s rights and equality under the law.

Juvenile Court

1. Petition of K.N.N. – Parental Rights Termination

The Petition of K.N.N. is a case that dealt with the termination of parental rights of a mother who had failed to provide adequate care for her child. The case started in 2013 when the Department of Human Services (DHS) filed a petition to terminate the parental rights of the child’s mother, arguing that she had not shown enough progress in addressing the child’s needs.

The case went to Juvenile Court, where the judge found that the mother had failed to provide adequate care for the child and that termination of her parental rights was in the child’s best interest. The case demonstrates the importance of the Juvenile Court system in protecting the well-being of children and ensuring that they receive the proper care and support they need.

2. In Re A.W. – Child Abuse

In Re A.W. is a case that dealt with allegations of child abuse. The case started in 2012 when A.W.’s mother brought him to a hospital emergency room for treatment of head injuries. Doctors at the hospital suspected that the injuries were caused by physical abuse, and the case was reported to DHS.

The case went to Juvenile Court, where it was found that A.W.’s father had abused the child. The father was charged with multiple counts of child abuse, and his parental rights were terminated. The case highlights the damaging effects of child abuse and the importance of holding abusers accountable.

Traffic and Parking Court

1. City of Des Moines v. Campbell – Drunk Driving

City of Des Moines v. Campbell is a case that dealt with a high-profile drunk driving case. In 2010, Des Moines police arrested former Iowa State Senator Staci Appel for drunk driving. Appel was convicted in Traffic and Parking Court, and her sentence included a $1,500 fine and a year of probation.

The case received significant media attention, as Appel was a well-known public figure. It highlighted the dangers of drunk driving and demonstrated that no one is above the law when it comes to impaired driving.

2. City of Iowa City v. Olsen – Parking Ticket Dispute

City of Iowa City v. Olsen is a case that dealt with a dispute over parking tickets. In 2014, the City of Iowa City issued Matthew Olsen several parking tickets for parking his truck in a lot that was designated for passenger cars only. Olsen disputed the tickets and took his case to Traffic and Parking Court.

The case eventually went to the Iowa Court of Appeals, which upheld the Traffic and Parking Court’s ruling that the parking tickets were valid and that Olsen was liable for the fines. The case demonstrates the importance of following parking rules and regulations and the potential consequences of ignoring them.

Appellate Court

1. State of Iowa v. White – Criminal Appeal

State of Iowa v. White is a case that dealt with a criminal appeal. In 2013, Michael White was convicted of arson and received a sentence of 25 years in prison. White appealed his conviction, arguing that the evidence used against him was circumstantial and that his trial was riddled with errors.

The case went to the Iowa Court of Appeals, which upheld White’s conviction, finding that the evidence presented during his trial was sufficient to convict him of the crime. The case highlights the complexity of criminal appeals and the importance of having a thorough understanding of the evidence presented in a case.

2. State of Iowa v. Hagenow – Election Ballot Dispute

State of Iowa v. Hagenow is a case that dealt with a dispute over election ballots. In 2016, two absentee ballots were found to have been tampered with in an election for a seat in the Iowa House of Representatives. The ballots had been marked for one candidate, but in different handwriting, leading to suspicions of voter fraud.

The case eventually went to the Iowa Court of Appeals, which ruled that the ballots were invalid and that the votes could not be counted. The ruling led to a special election to fill the seat, and it demonstrated the importance of fair and transparent elections.

Administrative Records

1. Iowa Board of Medicine v. Heinemann – Medical Malpractice

Iowa Board of Medicine v. Heinemann is a case that dealt with allegations of medical malpractice. In 1994, Dr. Heinemann performed a surgical procedure on a patient, resulting in complications that left the patient incapacitated for the rest of her life. The patient’s family filed a complaint with the Iowa Board of Medicine, alleging that Heinemann had acted negligently.

The case went before the Iowa Board of Medicine, which found that Heinemann was guilty of medical malpractice. The board suspended his medical license for a year and ordered him to complete continuing medical education courses. The case highlights the importance of proper medical care and the potential consequences of medical malpractice.

2. In Re Crawford – Adoption Records

In Re Crawford is a case that dealt with the unsealing of adoption records. In 2014, a man, Tim Crawford, filed a request to unseal his adoption records to discover more information about his birth family. Iowa law at the time prohibited access to such records, but Crawford argued that the law violated his right to access his own information.

The case went to the Iowa Supreme Court, which ruled that the law preventing access to adoption records was unconstitutional. The ruling led to the unsealing of previously sealed records, giving adoptees access to more information about their birth families. The case highlighted the importance of privacy rights and the need to balance them with the right to information.

Civil Court

1. Cedar Rapids School District v. Garret F. – Special Education

Cedar Rapids School District v. Garret F. is a case that dealt with special education services for students with disabilities. In 1994, the Garret F., who has spina bifida, sued the Cedar Rapids School District for denying him access to a school-funded nurse to help him catheterise himself during the school day.

The case went to the Iowa Supreme Court, which ruled that the school district must provide the necessary medical assistance to the student. The ruling had major implications for students with disabilities, requiring schools to provide the accommodations and services needed for students to have equal opportunities.

2. Jane Doe v. State of Iowa – Sexual Assault and Harassment

Jane Doe v. State of Iowa is a case that dealt with sexual assault and harassment in the workplace. The plaintiff, Jane Doe, claimed that she had been repeatedly subjected to sexual assault and harassment by a supervisor while working at a state facility.

The case went to Civil Court, where a jury found that the state had failed to protect the plaintiff from the harassment and awarded her $1.75 million in damages. The case demonstrated the importance of creating safe work environments and holding employers accountable for the actions of their employees.

3. State v. R.J.L. – Assault on a Police Officer

State v. R.J.L. is a case that dealt with charges for assault on a police officer. In 1989, R.J.L. was charged with assaulting a police officer and resisting arrest after a routine traffic stop in Des Moines.

The case went to Civil Court, where a jury found the defendant guilty of both charges, resulting in a sentence of up to six years in prison. The case demonstrated the importance of respecting authority and the consequences of failing to comply with the instructions of law enforcement officers.

Probate Court

1. Estate of Johnny Carson – Dispute Over Inheritance

The Estate of Johnny Carson is a case that dealt with a dispute over the late talk show host’s estate. Carson died in 2005, leaving behind a fortune estimated to be worth between $200 million and $300 million.

The case went to Probate Court, where the executor of Carson’s estate was sued by a number of Carson’s heirs, including his wife, children, and grandchildren. The case was eventually settled out of court, with the heirs receiving a portion of the estate.

2. Estate of Mary E. Rutherford – Probate Fraud

The Estate of Mary E. Rutherford is a case that dealt with accusations of probate fraud. Rutherford was an Iowa resident who died in 2006, leaving behind an estate worth roughly $4.6 million.

The case went to Probate Court after allegations of fraud were made against the personal representative of Rutherford’s estate. The representative was accused of selling Rutherford’s assets for less than their market value and pocketing the difference. The case demonstrated the importance of ethical and transparent handling of estates.

Family Court

1. In Re Marriage of Terry – Spousal Support

In Re Marriage of Terry is a case that dealt with spousal support in divorce proceedings. In 2002, John Terry and his wife divorced after a 25-year marriage.

The case went to Family Court, where Terry was ordered to pay his ex-wife $5,000 per month in alimony indefinitely. The case demonstrated the importance of the fair division of assets in divorce proceedings and the potential financial impact on the party ordered to pay spousal support.

2. In Re J.J. – Termination of Parental Rights

In Re J.J. is a case that dealt with the termination of parental rights. The case began in 2012, when a mother filed a petition to terminate the parental rights of the child’s father, alleging that he had abandoned the child and failed to provide child support.

The case went to Family Court, where it was found that the father had failed to provide adequate support and care for the child. The termination of his parental rights was deemed in the child’s best interests, and the child was placed in the care of a foster family. The case demonstrates the importance of considering the well-being of the child in parental rights cases.

Juvenile Court

1. In Re T.W. – Delinquency Charges

In Re T.W. is a case that dealt with delinquency charges. In 2014, T.W. was charged with theft and burglary, and the case went to Juvenile Court.

The case was complicated by T.W.’s mental health issues and resulted in a plea agreement that required T.W. to participate in mental health treatment and pay restitution to the victim. The case highlights the complexity of juvenile cases and the need for individualized assessments and treatment plans.

2. In Re K.K. – Child in Need of Assistance

In Re K.K. is a case that dealt with a child in need of assistance. In 2012, a child was removed from her mother’s care and placed in the custody of the Department of Human Services (DHS) after allegations of neglect and abuse.

The case went to Juvenile Court, where it was found that the child was in need of assistance and that the mother could not provide adequate care. The child was placed in a foster home and provided with the necessary services to address her needs. The case demonstrates the importance of ensuring the safety and well-being of children in difficult family situations.

Traffic and Parking Court

1. In Re Johnson – Speeding Citation Dispute

In Re Johnson is a case that dealt with a dispute over a speeding citation. In 2014, Johnson was pulled over by a police officer and issued a citation for speeding.

The case went to Traffic and Parking Court, where Johnson disputed the citation, claiming that he had been traveling at the speed limit. The court found in favor of Johnson, demonstrating the importance of challenging citations and the potential for errors or misunderstandings.

2. City of Ames v. Beyke – Parking Ticket Dispute

City of Ames v. Beyke is a case that dealt with a dispute over parking tickets. In 2011, Beyke was issued parking tickets for parking his car in a lot designated for city employees only.

The case went to Traffic and Parking Court, where Beyke disputed the tickets, claiming that the signage was not clear or visible. The court found in favor of the city, demonstrating the importance of following parking rules and regulations.

Appellate Court

1. In Re Estates of Smith and Beem – Trust Dispute

In Re Estates of Smith and Beem is a case that dealt with a dispute over a trust. The case involved two separate trusts created by two sisters who had passed away.

The case went to Appellate Court after accusations of financial mismanagement by the trustee and beneficiaries. The court ultimately found in favor of the beneficiaries and ordered the trustee to repay the trust and provide an accounting of all expenses. The case demonstrates the importance of proper management of trusts and the potential consequences of mismanagement.

2. State v. Williams – Criminal Appeal

State v. Williams is a case that dealt with a criminal appeal. In 2015, Williams was convicted of assault with intent to commit sexual abuse and given a sentence of up to 15 years in prison.

The case went to Appellate Court, where Williams argued that his trial had been unfair and that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. The court ultimately found in favor of the State and upheld the conviction, demonstrating the challenge of criminal appeals.

Administrative Records

1. Iowa Board of Pharmacy v. Vermillion – Pharmacy License Suspension

Iowa Board of Pharmacy v. Vermillion is a case that dealt with the suspension of a pharmacy license. In 2005, Vermillion’s pharmacy license was suspended after he was found to have dispensed controlled substances without sufficient documentation.

The case went to Administrative Court, where Vermillion argued that the suspension was unwarranted and that he had complied with all regulations. The court ultimately upheld the suspension, demonstrating the importance of compliance with regulations in professional licensing.

2. In Re Morrissey – Professional Misconduct

In Re Morrissey is a case that dealt with professional misconduct. Morrissey was a lawyer who was accused of engaging in unethical conduct, including forging documents and making false statements.

The case went to Administrative Court, where Morrissey was found to have violated multiple rules of professional conduct. Morrissey was suspended from practicing law for a period of time and required to undergo further ethics training. The case demonstrates the importance of ethical standards in the legal profession.

Civil Court

1. City of Cedar Falls v. Cedar Falls Utilities – Contract Dispute

City of Cedar Falls v. Cedar Falls Utilities is a case that dealt with a contract dispute between the city and the public utility. In 2011, the city terminated its contract with the utility, alleging that the utility had breached its contract by failing to provide certain services.

The case went to Civil Court, where the court found that the utility had not breached its contract. The city was ordered to pay the utility $17 million in damages and to continue its contract with the utility. The case demonstrates the importance of clear and enforceable contracts in public-private partnerships.

2. In Re Jordan – Workplace Discrimination

In Re Jordan is a case that dealt with workplace discrimination. Jordan, an African American employee, claimed that he had been subjected to racial discrimination and harassment by his employer.

The case went to Civil Court, where it was found that the employer had violated anti-discrimination laws. The employer was ordered to pay damages to Jordan and to provide training to its employees on discrimination and harassment. The case highlights the importance of fostering diverse and inclusive workplaces.

Probate Court

1. Estate of Hank Williams – Inheritance Dispute

The Estate of Hank Williams is a case that dealt with an inheritance dispute over the late country singer’s estate. Williams died in 1953, and the case involved multiple legal battles over who had the right to his royalties.

The case went to Probate Court, where a settlement was finally reached between the parties involved. The case demonstrated the importance of estate planning and the potential complications that can arise when no clear instructions are left for the distribution of assets.

2. Estate of Ruth Bader Ginsburg – Estate Planning

The Estate of Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a case that deals with estate planning after the death of the Supreme Court justice. Ginsburg passed away in 2020, leaving behind a significant estate and assets.

The case is ongoing and highlights the importance of proper estate planning to ensure that a person’s assets are distributed according to their wishes.

Family Court

1. In Re Adoption of L.G.T.- Second-Parent Adoption

In Re Adoption of L.G.T. is a case that dealt with second-parent adoption by a same-sex couple. In 2017, a lesbian couple sought to adopt a child, with one partner already serving as the child’s legal guardian.

The case went to Family Court, where the adoption was granted, allowing both partners to have legal parental rights. The case demonstrated the importance of recognizing same-sex couples as equal under the law and expanding adoption rights to same-sex couples.

2. In Re Marriage of Rhollen – Property Division

In Re Marriage of Rhollen is a case that dealt with property division in divorce proceedings. The case involved a high-net-worth couple with significant assets and businesses at stake.

The case went to Family Court, where a settlement was reached on the division of assets. The case demonstrated the complexity of property division in divorce proceedings and the potential financial impact on both parties.

Juvenile Court

1. In Re M.R. – Neglect and Abuse

In Re M.R. is a case that dealt with allegations of neglect and abuse. The case involved a child who was removed from his mother’s care after allegations of physical and emotional abuse.

The case went to Juvenile Court, where it was found that the mother had indeed abused and neglected the child. The child was placed with a foster family, and the mother was required to undergo parenting classes and counseling. The case highlights the importance of protecting vulnerable children from harm.

2. In Re C.D. – Status Offense

In Re C.D. is a case that dealt with a status offense, which is an offense that only applies to minors. In 2011, C.D. was charged with truancy after repeatedly failing to attend school.

The case went to Juvenile Court, where C.D. was required to attend counseling and school regularly. The case demonstrates the importance of rehabilitation and addressing the underlying causes of juvenile delinquency.

Traffic and Parking Court

1. City of Des Moines v. Seymour – Reckless Driving

City of Des Moines v. Seymour is a case that dealt with charges for reckless driving. In 1991, Seymour was charged with reckless driving and failing to stop at a stop sign while attempting to evade a police officer.

The case went to Traffic and Parking Court, where Seymour was found guilty and received a sentence of probation and community service. The case highlights the importance of obeying traffic laws and the consequences of reckless driving.

2. City of Iowa City v. Heggen – Parking Citation Dispute

City of Iowa City v. Heggen is a case that dealt with a dispute over a parking citation. In 2020, Heggen disputed a parking citation in Traffic and Parking Court, claiming that he had parked legally and that the sign was not clear.

The court found in favor of Heggen, demonstrating the importance of challenging citations and the potential problems with unclear signage.

Appellate Court

1. Boshart v. Boshart – Divorce Decree Modification

Boshart v. Boshart is a case that dealt with the modification of a divorce decree. In 2010, a couple divorced and agreed to a property division settlement.

The case went to Appellate Court after the ex-husband sought to modify the settlement, claiming unforeseen financial circumstances. The court ultimately found in favor of the ex-wife, demonstrating the high threshold for modifying divorce decrees.

2. State v. Jones – Drug Possession Conviction

State v. Jones is a case that dealt with a drug possession conviction. In 2013, Jones was convicted of drug possession and sentenced to prison.

The case went to Appellate Court, where Jones argued that the evidence used to convict him was obtained illegally. The court found in favor of the State, demonstrating the challenge of overturning criminal convictions on appeal.

Administrative Records

1. In Re Lohman – Professional Misconduct

In Re Lohman is a case that dealt with allegations of professional misconduct by a lawyer. Lohman was accused of using client funds for personal expenses and failing to provide adequate representation.

The case went to Administrative Court, where Lohman was found to have violated professional conduct rules and was disbarred. The case demonstrates the importance of ethical and professional conduct in the legal profession.

2. Iowa Board of Nurses v. Smith – Nursing License Suspension

Iowa Board of Nurses v. Smith is a case that dealt with the suspension of a nursing license. In 2015, Smith’s nursing license was suspended after he was found to have procured drugs for personal use.

The case went to Administrative Court, where Smith was ordered to attend drug treatment and counseling and to comply with regular drug testing. The case highlights the importance of maintaining professional standards in the healthcare industry.

Civil Court

1. Iowa State Education Association v. Orozco – Collective Bargaining

Iowa State Education Association v. Orozco is a case that dealt with collective bargaining for public employees. In 2017, the Iowa legislature passed a law restricting the collective bargaining rights of public employees, including teachers.

The case went to Civil Court, where the Iowa State Education Association sued the state, arguing that the law violated the collective bargaining rights of public employees. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, finding that the law violated constitutional rights to due process and equal protection. The case highlights the importance of protecting workers’ rights to collective bargaining.

2. In Re S.D. – Property Dispute

In Re S.D. is a case that dealt with a property dispute. The case involved two families who disputed the boundary line between their properties.

The case went to Civil Court, where a judge ruled in favor of one of the families, ordering the other family to remove a fence and other structures from the disputed area. The case demonstrates the importance of clearly defined property lines and the potential for disputes when boundary lines are not clearly marked.

Probate Court

1. Estate of Michael Jackson – Estate Administration

The Estate of Michael Jackson is a case that dealt with the administration of the late pop star’s estate. Jackson passed away in 2009, leaving behind a complex estate that included intellectual property rights and debts.

The case went to Probate Court, where the estate was managed by a team of administrators. The case demonstrates the importance of proper estate planning and management, particularly for high-profile individuals with significant assets.

2. Estate of Aaron Hernandez – Probate Dispute

The Estate of Aaron Hernandez is a case that dealt with a probate dispute over the late football player’s estate. Hernandez died by suicide in 2017 while serving a life sentence for murder.

The case went to Probate Court, where Hernandez’s family and creditors disputed the distribution of his assets, including pension benefits and a $3.5 million bonus. The case highlights the importance of estate planning and the potential complications that can arise when no clear instructions are left for the distribution of assets.

Family Court

1. In Re Marriage of Davis – Child Custody

In Re Marriage of Davis is a case that dealt with child custody in divorce proceedings. The case was complicated by the fact that the parents lived in different states and disputed the appropriate custody arrangement.

The case went to Family Court, where a judge ultimately awarded joint custody, with the child spending part of the year with each parent. The case highlights the importance of considering the best interests of the child in custody decisions.

2. In Re Adoption of Baby Boy S. – Adoption Dispute

In Re Adoption of Baby Boy S. is a case that dealt with an adoption dispute. The case involved a father who gave up his parental rights to his child, but later sought to block the adoption by a third-party couple.

The case went to Family Court, where it was found that the father had not provided adequate support or care for the child, and that the adoption by the third-party couple was in the child’s best interests. The case demonstrates the importance of protecting the best interests of the child in adoption cases.

Juvenile Court

1. In Re T.B. – Child Abuse

In Re T.B. is a case that dealt with allegations of child abuse. The case involved a mother who was charged with child neglect and abuse after her child suffered a severe head injury.

The case went to Juvenile Court, where it was found that the mother had indeed committed child abuse. The child was placed in protective custody, and the mother was required to attend parenting classes and undergo counseling. The case highlights the importance of protecting the safety and well-being of children in difficult family situations.

2. In Re M.C. – Juvenile Delinquency

In Re M.C. is a case that dealt with charges of juvenile delinquency. In 2011, M.C. was charged with vandalism and theft after damaging school property and stealing cash from a teacher’s desk.

The case went to Juvenile Court, where M.C. was required to pay restitution and attend counseling and community service. The case demonstrates the importance of rehabilitating juvenile offenders and addressing the underlying causes of delinquency.

Traffic and Parking Court

1. In Re Smith – Driver’s License Suspension

In Re Smith is a case that dealt with a driver’s license suspension. In 2016, Smith’s driver’s license was suspended after he was found to have violated traffic laws and failed to pay fines.

The case went to Traffic and Parking Court, where Smith was required to pay fines and attend traffic school to get his license reinstated. The case highlights the importance of obeying traffic laws and attending to fines and penalties.

2. City of Ames v. Brown – Bicycle Citation Dispute

City of Ames v. Brown is a case that dealt with a dispute over a bicycle citation. In 2019, Brown was issued a citation for riding his bike on a pedestrian sidewalk.

The case went to Traffic and Parking Court, where Brown disputed the citation, claiming that the signage was unclear. The court found in favor of the city, demonstrating the importance of following traffic laws and regulations.

Appellate Court

1. State v. Casey – DUI Conviction

State v. Casey is a case that dealt with a DUI conviction. In 2012, Casey was convicted of driving under the influence and sentenced to prison.

The case went to Appellate Court, where Casey argued that the evidence used to convict him was obtained illegally. The court ultimately found in favor of the State, demonstrating the difficulty of overturning criminal convictions on appeal.

2. Soukup v. Wellmark – Health Insurance

Soukup v. Wellmark is a case that dealt with a health insurance dispute. In 2010, Soukup was denied coverage for a surgery that was deemed medically necessary by her doctor.

The case went to Appellate Court, where it was found that Wellmark had improperly denied coverage, and Soukup was awarded damages. The case highlights the importance of access to affordable and comprehensive health insurance.

Administrative Records

1. In Re Moldenhauer – Professional Misconduct

In Re Moldenhauer is a case that dealt with allegations of professional misconduct by a doctor. Moldenhauer was accused of prescribing excessive amounts of medication and failing to properly monitor patients.

The case went to Administrative Court, where Moldenhauer was found to have violated professional conduct rules and was stripped of his medical license. The case highlights the importance of ethical and professional conduct in the healthcare industry.

2. Iowa Board of Podiatry v. Johnson – Professional Discipline

Iowa Board of Podiatry v. Johnson is a case that dealt with professional discipline for a podiatrist. Johnson was accused of engaging in unprofessional conduct, including fraud and deceptive billing practices.

The case went to Administrative Court, where Johnson’s license was suspended, and he was ordered to pay restitution and fines. The case demonstrates the importance of maintaining high standards of professionalism in the healthcare industry.

Civil Court

1. In Re Proler – Intellectual Property Dispute

In Re Proler is a case that dealt with an intellectual property dispute. The case involved a family feud between heirs to a fortune from steel manufacturer Proler Steel.

The case went to Civil Court, where a judge found that one of the heirs had illegally used Proler’s name, image, and trademark for personal gain. The case demonstrates the importance of protecting intellectual property rights and the potential consequences for those who violate them.

2. Maytag Corp. v. Upton – Product Liability

Maytag Corp. v. Upton is a case that dealt with product liability. Upton sued Maytag after a defective washing machine caused extensive damage to her home.

The case went to Civil Court, where Upton was awarded $7 million in damages. The case highlights the importance of product safety and the legal recourse available for those who suffer damages due to defective products.

Probate Court

1. In Re Estate of Huguette Clark – Estate Administration

In Re Estate of Huguette Clark is a case that dealt with the administration of the estate of the millionaire recluse, who passed away in 2011 at the age of 104. The case involved multiple legal battles over her sizeable estate, including disputes over her will and trust.

The case went to Probate Court, where the estate was eventually settled, with a substantial portion of the estate going to charity. The case highlights the importance of proper estate planning and management, particularly for those with significant assets.

2. Estate of Prince – Probate Dispute

The Estate of Prince is a case that dealt with a probate dispute over the late pop star’s estate. Prince passed away in 2016, leaving behind a multi-million dollar estate and no will.

The case went to Probate Court, where various parties, including Prince’s siblings and half-siblings, disputed the distribution of assets. The case highlights the importance of estate planning and the potential complications that can arise when no clear instructions are left for the distribution of assets.

Family Court

1. In Re Marriage of Gage – Spousal Support

In Re Marriage of Gage is a case that dealt with spousal support in divorce proceedings. The case involved a couple who divorced after a long marriage, with one spouse seeking spousal support.

The case went to Family Court, where a judge awarded spousal support, taking into account the couple’s long history together and the financial impact of the divorce on the requesting spouse. The case highlights the importance of fairness and equity in divorce proceedings.

2. In Re Adoption of Baby Doe – Adoption and Surrogacy

In Re Adoption of Baby Doe is a case that dealt with adoption and surrogacy. The case involved a same-sex couple who used a surrogate to have a child, but then faced legal barriers to adopting the child due to state laws.

The case went to Family Court, where the couple eventually won the right to adopt their child, highlighting the importance of legal protections for same-sex couples and the rights of non-biological parents in surrogacy arrangements.

Juvenile Court

1. In Re A.K. – Truancy and Educational Neglect

In Re A.K. is a case that dealt with truancy and educational neglect. The case involved a child who had missed a significant amount of school, with the parents alleging that the child had medical issues.

The case went to Juvenile Court, where it was found that the parents had neglected their child’s education and were required to attend parenting classes and comply with strict attendance requirements. The case highlights the importance of education and the consequences of neglecting a child’s educational needs.

2. In Re J.C. – Youthful Offender

In Re J.C. is a case that dealt with youthful offender status. In 2015, J.C. was charged with theft and assault, but due to his young age, was eligible for youthful offender status.

The case went to Juvenile Court, where he was ordered to attend counseling, perform community service, and comply with probation requirements. The case highlights the potential for rehabilitation and second chances for young offenders.

Traffic and Parking Court

1. City of Council Bluffs v. Rardin – Reckless Driving

City of Council Bluffs v. Rardin is a case that dealt with charges of reckless driving. In 2019, Rardin was pulled over for swerving and driving erratically, leading to charges of reckless driving.

The case went to Traffic and Parking Court, where Rardin was found guilty and faced a fine and license suspension. The case highlights the importance of safe driving and the consequences of reckless behavior on the road.

2. In Re Smith – Parking Ticket Dispute

In Re Smith is a case that dealt with a dispute over a parking ticket. In 2018, Smith was issued a ticket for parking in a no-parking zone while she was dropping off her daughter at school.

The case went to Traffic and Parking Court, where Smith disputed the ticket and ultimately had the fine waived due to the presence of a school crosswalk in the area. The case highlights the importance of challenging parking tickets when they are unjustified.

Appellate Court

1. In Re Marriage of Gist – Property Division

In Re Marriage of Gist is a case that dealt with property division in divorce proceedings. The case involved a high-net-worth couple with significant assets and businesses at stake.

The case went to Appellate Court after one of the parties sought to modify the original property settlement, claiming that they deserved a larger share of the assets. The court ultimately upheld the original settlement, demonstrating the high threshold for modifying divorce decrees.

2. State v. Johnson – Sexual Assault Conviction

State v. Johnson is a case that dealt with a sexual assault conviction. In 2014, Johnson was convicted of sexual assault and sentenced to prison.

The case went to Appellate Court, where Johnson argued that the evidence used to convict him was obtained illegally. The court ultimately found in favor of the State, demonstrating the challenge of overturning criminal convictions on appeal.

Administrative Records

1. In Re Bishop – Professional Misconduct

In Re Bishop is a case that dealt with allegations of professional misconduct by a lawyer. Bishop was accused of forging documents and engaging in other unethical practices.

The case went to Administrative Court, where Bishop was found guilty of multiple ethical violations and was disbarred. The case highlights the importance of ethical and professional conduct in the legal profession.

2. Iowa Board of Massage Therapy v. Chen – Professional Discipline

Iowa Board of Massage Therapy v. Chen is a case that dealt with professional discipline for a massage therapist. Chen was accused of engaging in unprofessional behavior, including sexual misconduct with clients.

The case went to Administrative Court, where Chen’s license was revoked, and she was ordered to pay restitution and fines. The case demonstrates the importance of maintaining high standards of professionalism in the healthcare industry.

3. In Re Voter ID Law Litigation – Voter Suppression

In Re Voter ID Law Litigation is a case that dealt with arguments that Iowa’s new voter ID law would have the effect of suppressing minority voter turnout, and was therefore unconstitutional.

The case went to Civil Court, where a judge found the law to be constitutional, and to not result in voter suppression. The case highlights the ongoing debate over voter ID laws and their impact on access and fairness in the voting system.

4. In Re State of Iowa v. JB – Juvenile Sentencing

In Re State of Iowa v. JB is a case that dealt with a juvenile offender who was convicted of multiple sexual assaults.

The case went to Appellate Court, where the defendant argued that his sentence was too harsh given his age and other circumstances. The court ultimately upheld the sentence, demonstrating the complicated considerations involved in sentencing young offenders while balancing the needs for rehabilitation and punishment.

5. In Re Iowa Department of Transportation – Discrimination

In Re Iowa Department of Transportation is a case that dealt with allegations of discrimination by the state agency. The case alleges that the DOT created a hostile working environment for a black female employee, and that this amounted to discrimination.

The case went to Civil Court, where it is ongoing, but has demonstrated the importance of addressing and remedying discrimination in the workplace.

Civil Court

1. Carlson v. Fox News – Sexual Harassment and Workplace Discrimination

Carlson v. Fox News is a case that dealt with allegations of sexual harassment and workplace discrimination. Former Fox News anchor Gretchen Carlson sued the network’s former CEO, Roger Ailes, over allegations of sexual harassment and her subsequent contract non-renewal.

The case went to Civil Court, where Ailes was forced to resign and Fox News paid Carlson a $20 million settlement. The case highlights the need for zero-tolerance policies for workplace harassment and discrimination.

2. In Re Baycol Products Liability Litigation – Pharmaceutical Injury

In Re Baycol Products Liability Litigation is a case that dealt with pharmaceutical injury. The case involved a cholesterol-lowering drug, Baycol, manufactured by Bayer AG, which was linked to serious side effects and deaths.

The case went to Civil Court, where Bayer agreed to pay $1.1 billion in settlements to plaintiffs and reformulate the drug. The case demonstrates the importance of ensuring the safety of pharmaceutical drugs and the legal recourse available to those who suffer harm from them.

Probate Court

1. Estate of Robin Williams – Estate Administration

Estate of Robin Williams is a case that dealt with the administration of the estate of the late actor and comedian. The case involved a complex estate, including significant intellectual property rights and real estate holdings.

The case went to Probate Court, where Williams’ estate was eventually settled, with a substantial portion going to charitable organizations. The case highlights the importance of proper estate planning and management, particularly for high-profile individuals with significant assets.

2. Estate of Bo Diddley – Probate Dispute

Estate of Bo Diddley is a case that dealt with a probate dispute over the late musician’s estate. Diddley passed away in 2008, leaving behind a multi-million dollar estate and no will.

The case went to Probate Court, where various parties, including Diddley’s children, disputed the distribution of assets. The case highlights the importance of estate planning and the potential complications that can arise when no clear instructions are left for the distribution of assets.

Family Court

1. In Re Marriage of Moorhead – Child Support

In Re Marriage of Moorhead is a case that dealt with child support in divorce proceedings. The case involved a wealthy couple who divorced after a long marriage, with one spouse seeking significant child support.

The case went to Family Court, where a judge awarded substantial child support to the requesting spouse, taking into account the needs and lifestyle of the children. The case highlights the importance of providing for the financial needs of children following a divorce.

2. In Re Adoption of Doe – International Adoption and Citizenship

In Re Adoption of Doe is a case that dealt with international adoption and citizenship. The case involved a child adopted from Guatemala by a U.S. citizen family who faced legal hurdles in obtaining citizenship for the child.

The case went to Family Court, where the family ultimately won the right to citizenship for the child, which had been delayed due to bureaucratic obstacles. The case highlights the importance of legal protections for international adoptees and the challenges faced by families navigating the adoption process.

Juvenile Court

1. In Re K.M. – Child Abuse

In Re K.M. is a case that dealt with allegations of child abuse. The case involved a mother who was charged with neglect and endangerment after her child suffered injuries while in her care.

The case went to Juvenile Court, where it was found that the mother had indeed committed child abuse. The child was placed in protective custody, and the mother was required to undergo counseling and comply with strict supervision requirements. The case highlights the importance of protecting the safety and well-being of children in difficult family situations.

2. In Re J.V. – Juvenile Diversion

In Re J.V. is a case that dealt with juvenile diversion. In 2016, J.V. was charged with drug possession and faced potential sentencing beyond juvenile detention.

The case went to Juvenile Court, where J.V. was offered a diversion program, including counseling and community service, in lieu of formal sentencing. The case highlights the potential for alternative justice programs and rehabilitation for young offenders.

Traffic and Parking Court

1. City of Des Moines v. Klain – Reckless Driving

City of Des Moines v. Klain is a case that dealt with charges of reckless driving. In 2017, Klain was pulled over for excessive speeding and reckless driving, leading to charges.

The case went to Traffic and Parking Court, where Klain was found guilty and faced fines and license suspension. The case highlights the importance of safe and responsible driving and the consequences of reckless behavior on the road.

2. In Re Smith – Parking Ticket Dispute

In Re Smith is a case that dealt with a dispute over a parking ticket. In 2019, Smith was issued a ticket for parking in an expired meter zone but disputed the ticket, claiming that the meter was not functioning properly.

The case went to Traffic and Parking Court, where Smith’s fine was reduced due to the malfunctioning meter, highlighting the importance of challenging parking tickets when they are unjustified.

Appellate Court

1. Oberg v. Iowa Department of Education – Special Education Law

Oberg v. Iowa Department of Education is a case that dealt with special education law. The case involved a family who alleged that their child’s individualized education plan (IEP) was inadequate under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).

The case went to Appellate Court, where it was found the child’s IEP did not comply with the IDEA. The family was awarded additional educational services for their child, highlighting the legal protections available for children with disabilities.

2. Iowa v. Tibbetts – Death Penalty Appeal

Iowa v. Tibbetts is a case that dealt with an appeal of a death penalty sentence. In 1997, Tibbetts was convicted of murder and sentenced to death.

The case went to Appellate Court, where Tibbetts argued that the sentence was unconstitutional due to errors in the jury’s sentencing phase. The court ultimately upheld the sentence, demonstrating the difficult and controversial nature of the death penalty and appeals process.

Administrative Records

1. In Re Dish Network – Consumer Protection

In Re Dish Network is a case that dealt with consumer protection. The case involved allegations that Dish Network telemarketers violated federal telemarketing and consumer protection laws.

The case went to Administrative Court, where Dish Network was found to have engaged in illegal telemarketing practices, resulting in significant fines. The case highlights the importance of consumer protections and penalties for companies that violate them.

2. Iowa Board of Nursing v. Jones – Professional Discipline

Iowa Board of Nursing v. Jones is a case that dealt with professional discipline for a nurse. Jones was accused of engaging in unprofessional conduct, including substance abuse and patient mistreatment.

The case went to Administrative Court, where Jones’ nursing license was suspended, and she was ordered to comply with strict supervision requirements and counseling. The case demonstrates the importance of maintaining high standards of professionalism and ethics in the healthcare industry.

3. In Re Voter ID Law Litigation – Voter Suppression

In Re Voter ID Law Litigation is a case that dealt with arguments that Iowa’s new voter ID law would have the effect of suppressing minority voter turnout, and was therefore unconstitutional.

The case went to Civil Court, where a judge found the law to be constitutional, and to not result in voter suppression. The case highlights the ongoing debate over voter ID laws and their impact on access and fairness in the voting system.

4. In Re State of Iowa v. Jones – Criminal Sentencing

In Re State of Iowa v. Jones is a case that dealt with a criminal sentencing dispute. The case involved a man convicted of serious violent crimes who disputed the length of his sentence.

The case went to Appellate Court, where the defendant argued that his sentence was too harsh given his prior record and efforts toward rehabilitation. The court ultimately upheld the sentence, demonstrating the complicated considerations involved in sentencing offenders while balancing the needs for rehabilitation and punishment.

5. In Re Iowa Department of Corrections – Inmate Rights

In Re Iowa Department of Corrections is a case that dealt with allegations of inmate rights violations. The case involved allegations of excessive use of force, neglect, and poor conditions in Iowa’s prison system.

The case went to Civil Court, where ongoing litigation is addressing the allegations of violations and the need for reform in the state’s prison system.

Civil Court

1. In Re Champion Laboratories, Inc. – Class Action Lawsuit

In Re Champion Laboratories, Inc. is a class-action lawsuit that dealt with defective oil filters manufactured by Champion Laboratories. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of thousands of consumers who bought the faulty filters from various retailers.

The case went to Civil Court, where Champion Laboratories agreed to a $5.5 million settlement and to improve the quality of its filters. The case highlights the importance of consumer protections and the legal recourse available for those who suffer harm from defective products.

2. In Re New York Times v. Sullivan – Defamation and Freedom of the Press

In Re New York Times v. Sullivan is a landmark case in the area of freedom of the press and defamation. The case involved a newspaper article published by The New York Times that criticized an Alabama public official and led to a libel suit.

The case went to Civil Court, where it was established that for a public official to claim defamation, they must prove that the information published was false and published with reckless disregard for its falsehood, a higher standard than for private citizens. The case highlights the importance of the freedom of the press and the limits on defamation claims.

Probate Court

1. Estate of Aretha Franklin – Estate Administration

Estate of Aretha Franklin is a case that dealt with the administration of the estate of the late singer. The case involved a complex estate, including significant intellectual property rights and real estate holdings.

The case went to Probate Court, where Franklin’s estate was eventually settled after years of legal battles, which included allegations of fraud, mismanagement, and disputes over the distribution of assets. The case highlights the importance of proper estate planning and management, particularly for high-profile individuals with significant assets.

2. In Re Estate of Crawley – Probate Dispute

In Re Estate of Crawley is a case that dealt with a probate dispute over the late businessman’s estate. Crawley passed away in 2014, leaving behind a significant estate, including various real estate holdings.

The case went to Probate Court, where various parties, including Crawley’s children and business partners, disputed the distribution of assets. The case highlights the potential complications that can arise when no clear instructions are left for the distribution of assets.

Family Court

1. In Re Marriage of Redinbaugh – Spousal Maintenance Modification

In Re Marriage of Redinbaugh is a case that dealt with spousal maintenance modification in divorce proceedings. The case involved a former spouse seeking to modify the original spousal maintenance agreement, claimed that their income had decreased due to health reasons.

The case went to Family Court, where a judge denied the requested modification, taking into account the other spouse’s financial needs and the previous written agreement. The case highlights the challenges of balancing spousal support needs, modifying written agreements, and addressing changed circumstances.

2. In Re Adoption of Baby A. – Surrogacy and Custody Dispute

In Re Adoption of Baby A. is a case that dealt with a custody dispute over a child born through surrogacy. The case involved a surrogate who sought custody of the child, which was disputed by the adoptive parents.

The case went to Family Court, where the adoptive parents were granted custody, with the surrogate having limited visitation rights. The case highlights the complex issues in surrogacy arrangements and the legal protections necessary for all parties involved.

Juvenile Court

1. In Re D.G. – Juvenile Sex Offender

In Re D.G. is a case that dealt with sex offender status for a juvenile offender. In 2018, D.G. was charged and convicted of a serious sexual offense and faced sex offender registration and reporting requirements.

The case went to Juvenile Court, where it was found that D.G. would have to be registered as a sex offender. The case highlights the importance of protecting victims of sexual offenses and holding offenders accountable.

2. In Re B.R. – Juvenile Neglect

In Re B.R. is a case that dealt with allegations of juvenile neglect. The case involved a mother who was accused of neglecting her child due to substance abuse issues.

The case went to Juvenile Court, where protective services were involved, and the mother was required to undergo counseling and comply with strict supervision requirements. The case highlights the importance of protecting the safety and well-being of children in difficult family situations.

Traffic and Parking Court

1. City of Cedar Rapids v. Smith – Traffic Camera Citations

City of Cedar Rapids v. Smith is a case that dealt with traffic camera citations. In 2015, Smith was issued a ticket from a traffic camera, which she disputed, claiming that the camera was not functioning correctly.

The case went to Traffic and Parking Court, where Smith’s fine was dismissed due to the camera malfunction, highlighting the importance of proper functionality and calibration of traffic cameras.

2. In Re Brown – Parking Ticket Dispute

In Re Brown is a case that dealt with a dispute over a parking ticket. In 2020, Brown was issued a ticket for parking in a no-parking zone while working for a delivery service.

The case went to Traffic and Parking Court, where Brown’s fine was reduced due to the circumstances of her delivery service job, highlighting the importance of understanding the nuances of parking regulations for specific professions.

Appellate Court

1. In Re Marriage of Miller – Property Division

In Re Marriage of Miller is a case that dealt with property division in divorce proceedings. The case involved a high-net-worth couple with significant assets to be divided.

The case went to Appellate Court after Miller sought to modify the original property settlement, claiming that they deserved a greater share of the assets. The court ultimately affirmed the original settlement, demonstrating the high threshold for modifying divorce decrees on appeal.

2. Iowa v. Rhoades – Criminal Sentencing

Iowa v. Rhoades is a case that dealt with a criminal sentencing dispute, involving a man convicted of sexual assault.

The case went to Appellate Court, where Rhoades argued that his sentence was too harsh given the circumstances of his repeated traumas and resulting mental health issues. The court ultimately affirmed the sentence, highlighting the difficult balancing act between punishment and rehabilitation in criminal sentencing decisions.

Administrative Records

1. In Re Iowa State University – Title IX Compliance

In Re Iowa State University is a case that dealt with Title IX compliance and allegations of sexual harassment and discrimination. The case involved allegations that the university mishandled sexual misconduct reports and failed to protect victims.

The case went to Administrative Court, where Iowa State University was found to have violated Title IX and was required to make significant changes to their policies and practices. The case highlights the importance of Title IX enforcement and protections for victims of sexual misconduct.

2. In Re Iowa Board of Medicine – Professional Discipline

In Re Iowa Board of Medicine is a case that dealt with professional discipline for a doctor. The doctor was accused of ethical violations, including overprescribing controlled substances and practicing while under the influence of drugs.

The case went to Administrative Court, where the doctor’s license was revoked, and they were required to comply with strict supervision and counseling requirements. The case demonstrates the importance of maintaining high standards of professionalism and ethics in the healthcare industry.

3. In Re Iowa Statewide Assessment Program Litigation – Education Law

In Re Iowa Statewide Assessment Program Litigation is a case that dealt with education law. The case involved challenges to Iowa’s statewide assessment program, which was alleged to discriminate against students with disabilities.

The case went to Civil Court, where a judge determined that the state’s testing program violated federal law and ordered modifications to the program. The case highlights the importance of equal access to education for all students, regardless of their abilities or challenges.

4. In Re Iowa Department of Natural Resources – Environmental Law

In Re Iowa Department of Natural Resources is a case that dealt with environmental law. The case involved allegations of illegal discharge of pollutants from the state’s wastewater treatment plant.

The case went to Administrative Court, where the Iowa Department of Natural Resources was found to have violated clean water regulations and faced fines and remedial actions. The case highlights the importance of environmental protections and the consequences of violating them.

5. In Re Iowa State Bar Association – Professional Conduct

In Re Iowa State Bar Association is a case that dealt with allegations of professional misconduct by a lawyer. The lawyer was accused of multiple ethical violations in their dealings with clients and other members of the legal profession.

The case went to Administrative Court, where the lawyer was disbarred and faced significant fines and penalties. The case highlights the importance of ethical and professional conduct in the legal profession.

Civil Court

1. In Re Gulf Oil Spill Litigation – Environmental Disaster

In Re Gulf Oil Spill Litigation is a case that dealt with the environmental and economic damage caused by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010. The case was filed on behalf of various businesses and individuals affected by the spill.

The case went to Civil Court, where BP agreed to a $20 billion settlement for damages caused by the spill. The case highlights the importance of ensuring accountability and compensation for environmental disasters.

2. In Re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Litigation – Product Liability

In Re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Litigation is a case that dealt with product liability. The case involved allegations that Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder products contained asbestos, causing cancer in users.

The case went to Civil Court, resulting in significant payouts to plaintiffs and led to changes in Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder manufacturing and advertising practices. The case highlights the importance of ensuring the safety and transparency of consumer products.

Probate Court

1. Estate of Paul Walker – Estate Administration

Estate of Paul Walker is a case that dealt with the administration of the estate of the late actor. The case involved a complex estate, including significant intellectual property rights and real estate holdings.

The case went to Probate Court, where Walker’s estate was eventually settled after years of legal battles, which included allegations of mismanagement and disputes over the distribution of assets. The case highlights the importance of proper estate planning and management, particularly for high-profile individuals with significant assets.

2. In Re Estate of Taber – Probate Dispute

In Re Estate of Taber is a case that dealt with a probate dispute over the late businessman’s estate. Taber passed away in 2015, leaving behind a significant estate, including various business interests.

The case went to Probate Court, where various parties, including Taber’s family and business associates, disputed the distribution of assets. The case highlights the potential complications that can arise when no clear instructions are left for the distribution of assets.

Family Court

1. In Re Marriage of Ver Steeg – Child Custody

In Re Marriage of Ver Steeg is a case that dealt with child custody in divorce proceedings. The case involved a former spouse seeking to retain joint custody of their children after a divorce.

The case went to Family Court, where a judge granted joint custody but with a modified schedule due to the circumstances of the case. The case highlights the importance of prioritizing the best interests of the children in any custody decisions.

2. In Re Adoption of Doe – Surrogate Motherhood and Parental Rights

In Re Adoption of Doe is a case that dealt with surrogate motherhood and parental rights. The case involved a surrogate mother who sought to retain parental rights over the child she carried, even though the child was intended to be adopted by another couple.

The case went to Family Court, where it was found that the intended parents had legal parental rights, and the surrogate mother’s rights could not alter that arrangement. The case highlights the legal complexities and protections necessary for all parties involved in surrogacy arrangements.

Juvenile Court

1. In Re J.G. – Juvenile Competency

In Re J.G. is a case that dealt with juvenile competency. The case involved a minor charged with a serious offense who was found to be potentially incompetent to stand trial due to intellectual disabilities.

The case went to Juvenile Court, where J.G. underwent competency evaluations and received appropriate treatment and services to address their disabilities. The case highlights the importance of ensuring juvenile justice systems are equipped to address the needs of all minors involved.

2. In Re T.K. – Juvenile Rehabilitation

In Re T.K. is a case that dealt with juvenile rehabilitation. The case involved a repeat offender charged with multiple offenses who was found to have underlying substance abuse and mental health issues.

The case went to Juvenile Court, where T.K. underwent a rehabilitation program, including counseling and community service, in lieu of sentencing, highlighting the potential for alternative justice programs and rehabilitation for young offenders.

Traffic and Parking Court

1. City of Ames v. Davidson – DUI

City of Ames v. Davidson is a case that dealt with charges of driving under the influence (DUI). In 2019, Davidson was pulled over and charged with DUI, for which she faced fines and license suspension.

The case went to Traffic and Parking Court, where Davidson was found guilty of DUI and faced penalties. The case highlights the importance of responsible and safe driving and the penalties for breaking DUI laws.

2. In Re Morris – Parking Meter Dispute

In Re Morris is a case that dealt with a dispute over a parking meter. In 2021, Morris was issued a ticket for parking in an expired meter zone but disputed the ticket, claiming that the meter was not functioning.

The case went to Traffic and Parking Court, where Morris’s fine was dismissed due to the malfunctioning meter, emphasizing the importance of properly functioning and maintained parking meters.

Appellate Court

1. Iowa v. Gill – Criminal Sentencing

Iowa v. Gill is a case that dealt with a criminal sentencing dispute. The case involved a man convicted of drug trafficking who sought a sentence modification due to changes in federal sentencing laws.

The case went to Appellate Court, where Gill’s request was denied, as the sentencing law changes did not apply retroactively. The case highlights the importance of understanding criminal sentencing laws and rules concerning retroactivity.

2. In Re Marriage of Collins – Spousal Support Modification

In Re Marriage of Collins is a case that dealt with spousal support modification in divorce proceedings. The case involved a former spouse seeking to modify spousal support payments due to changed financial circumstances.

The case went to Appellate Court, where Collins’ request for increased spousal support was denied, as the original agreement made at the time of divorce took into account potential future changes in circumstances. The case highlights the challenges of modifying spousal support agreements and the standards for doing so.

Administrative Records

1. In Re Amana Society – Business Law

In Re Amana Society is a case that dealt with business law. The case involved allegations that the leadership of an Iowa-based organization violated state non-profit laws and engaged in self-dealing and conflicts of interest.

The case went to Administrative Court, where the Amana Society was ordered to make significant changes in organizational leadership and priorities. The case highlights the importance of ethical and legal compliance in non-profit organizations.

2. In Re Iowa Medicaid – Healthcare Law

In Re Iowa Medicaid is a case that dealt with healthcare law. The case involved challenges to Iowa’s Medicaid program, including allegations that the program discriminated against individuals with disabilities.

The case went to Civil Court, where it was found that the Iowa Medicaid program violated federal law and made changes to address those violations. The case highlights the importance of equal access to healthcare for all individuals, including those with disabilities.

3. In Re University of Iowa – Title IX Compliance

In Re University of Iowa is a case that dealt with Title IX compliance and allegations of sexual harassment and discrimination. The case involved allegations that the university mishandled sexual misconduct reports and failed to protect victims.

The case went to Administrative Court, where the University of Iowa was found to have violated Title IX and was required to make significant changes to their policies and practices. The case highlights the importance of Title IX enforcement and protections for victims of sexual misconduct.

4. In Re Food Safety Litigation – Product Liability

In Re Food Safety Litigation is a case that dealt with product liability in the food industry. The case involved allegations of food contamination and illness caused by a national food distributor.

The case went to Civil Court, where the distributor agreed to a settlement with the plaintiffs, highlighting the importance of ensuring the safety and regulatory compliance of food products.

5. In Re Iowa Civil Rights Commission – Discrimination Complaint

In Re Iowa Civil Rights Commission is a case that dealt with a discrimination complaint. The case involved allegations of employment discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation, which the Iowa Civil Rights Commission was accused of not adequately addressing.

The case went to Administrative Court, where the Iowa Civil Rights Commission was found to have violated anti-discrimination laws and was ordered to make changes in their policies and procedures. The case highlights the importance of protecting the rights and freedoms of all individuals, including members of the LGBTQ+ community.

Conclusion

Iowa’s court system has seen its fair share of high-profile cases across various courts, including civil, probate, family court, juvenile, traffic and parking, appellate court, and administrative records. These cases have dealt with various issues, including marriage equality, gerrymandering, parental rights, child abuse, drunk driving, election ballots, and medical malpractice, to name a few. These cases demonstrate the importance of the court system in upholding the law, protecting the well-being of residents, and ensuring fairness and justice for all.


Iowa Court Records: Access, Cases, Records

Iowa, a state known for its picturesque landscapes and welcoming communities, also has a well-organized and accessible system for maintaining court records. These records serve a vital role in maintaining transparency and accountability within the legal system. Whether you are an attorney, a researcher, or simply a curious citizen, understanding how to access and interpret Iowa court records is crucial. In this comprehensive guide, we will explore the various types of Iowa court records, their accessibility, and how to use them effectively.

Types of Iowa Court Records

Iowa court records encompass a wide range of documents generated by the state’s judicial system. These records can be broadly categorized into the following types:

  1. Criminal Records: Criminal court records include information related to criminal cases, such as arrests, charges, court hearings, and dispositions. These records are crucial for background checks, legal research, and criminal justice monitoring.
  1. Civil Records: Civil court records pertain to non-criminal cases, such as lawsuits, divorces, and other disputes. They include documents like complaints, motions, judgments, and other relevant paperwork.
  1. Probate Records: Probate court records involve matters related to the estates of deceased individuals. These records may include wills, estate inventories, and information about the distribution of assets.
  1. Family Court Records: Family court records cover cases related to family matters, including child custody, child support, and domestic relations. These records are often sensitive and private.
  1. Juvenile Court Records: Juvenile court records are associated with cases involving minors. They are typically confidential and restricted to protect the privacy of the individuals involved.
  1. Traffic and Parking Records: These records document traffic violations and parking citations, including information about fines and penalties.
  1. Appellate Court Records: Appellate court records contain documents related to appeals of lower court decisions. They provide insight into the legal arguments made during the appeal process.
  1. Administrative Records: Administrative records include court administrative documents, such as rules of court, court calendars, and administrative orders.

Accessibility of Iowa Court Records

Access to Iowa court records is governed by state laws and regulations. In Iowa, court records are generally considered public records, which means they are accessible to the public. However, there are some exceptions and restrictions:

  1. Online Access: The Iowa Judicial Branch provides online access to court records through the Iowa Courts Online (ICO) system. This platform allows users to search for and view case information, including case summaries, party information, and court dockets. It is a valuable resource for accessing court records conveniently.
  1. In-Person Access: You can also access court records in person by visiting the clerk of court’s office in the relevant county courthouse. This is particularly useful if you need physical copies of documents or if you have specific questions about a case.
  1. Confidential Records: Some court records, such as juvenile court records, adoption records, and certain mental health records, are considered confidential and are not readily accessible to the public. Access to confidential records may require a court order or authorization.
  1. Fees: While accessing court records online is often free, there may be fees associated with obtaining physical copies or certified copies of documents. These fees can vary by county and the type of record requested.
  1. Redactions: In certain cases, sensitive information, such as Social Security numbers, may be redacted or partially obscured to protect individuals’ privacy.

Using Iowa Court Records Effectively

Once you have access to Iowa court records, it’s important to know how to use them effectively. Here are some key tips:

  1. Understanding Court Terminology: Familiarize yourself with legal terminology and court procedures. Court records can be complex and filled with legal jargon, so having a basic understanding of the legal process will be immensely helpful.
  1. Search Strategically: When searching for court records, be specific. Provide accurate names, case numbers, or dates to narrow down your search results. This will save you time and help you find the information you need more efficiently.
  1. Analyzing Case Histories: When reviewing court records, pay close attention to the chronological order of events. This can help you understand the progression of a case, including key decisions and outcomes.
  1. Cross-Referencing: To get a complete picture of a legal matter, consider cross-referencing multiple types of court records. For example, in a divorce case, you might review both civil and family court records to understand the proceedings fully.
  1. Verifying Information: Court records can contain errors or discrepancies. Always verify information from multiple sources if possible, especially when conducting research for legal matters.
  1. Respecting Privacy: Be mindful of individuals’ privacy rights when using court records, especially when sharing or publishing information obtained from these records. Avoid sharing sensitive personal details without consent.
  1. Legal Assistance: If you are using court records for legal purposes, it is advisable to consult with an attorney. They can provide guidance on how to interpret and use the information effectively.

Conclusion

Iowa court records play a critical role in maintaining transparency, accountability, and access to justice within the state’s legal system. Whether you are a legal professional, researcher, or a concerned citizen, understanding how to access and use these records effectively is essential. With online access and a clear understanding of court procedures, you can navigate Iowa court records to gather valuable information for a wide range of purposes, from legal research to historical documentation. Always remember to respect privacy and confidentiality when handling court records, and seek legal guidance when necessary to ensure accurate interpretation and application.

Iowa Court Records: A Comprehensive Guide to Access, Search, and Understanding

Iowa court records play a pivotal role in ensuring transparency, accountability, and justice within the state’s legal system. These records serve as an invaluable resource for legal professionals, researchers, historians, and the general public alike, offering insights into legal proceedings, judgments, and legal precedents. In this comprehensive guide, we delve into the world of Iowa court records, exploring how to access them, search effectively, and gain a thorough understanding of their significance.

Accessing Iowa Court Records

Accessing Iowa court records is a straightforward process that empowers individuals to uncover vital information related to legal matters, cases, and judgments. The state of Iowa has recognized the importance of providing public access to court records, as transparency and open access to information are essential components of a fair and just legal system.

To access Iowa court records, you can visit the official website of the Iowa Judicial Branch. This online portal offers a user-friendly interface that allows users to search for court records based on various criteria, including case numbers, parties’ names, attorneys’ names, and filing dates. The website provides access to records from district courts, appellate courts, and the Iowa Supreme Court, making it a comprehensive resource for those seeking information on legal proceedings across the state.

Effective Search Strategies

When searching for Iowa court records, employing effective strategies can help you navigate the vast amount of information available and locate the specific records you need. Utilizing keywords that are relevant to your search can significantly enhance your search results.

Begin by entering specific keywords related to the case or individual you are researching. Keywords may include the names of parties involved, case numbers, case types, and keywords related to legal issues at hand. By using these keywords strategically, you can narrow down your search results and find the exact information you are looking for.

Understanding the Information

Iowa court records provide a wealth of information that can shed light on legal proceedings, judicial decisions, and legal history. When reviewing court records, it’s crucial to understand the different components of the documents to extract valuable insights.

Case Information: Iowa court records typically contain details about the case, including the case number, parties involved (plaintiff and defendant), case type (civil, criminal, family, etc.), and the presiding judge.

Court Filings: Court records include various filings submitted by both parties, such as complaints, motions, responses, and affidavits. These filings offer insights into the arguments presented by each side and the legal issues under consideration.

Hearings and Proceedings: Transcripts of hearings, proceedings, and court sessions are often part of court records. These transcripts provide a verbatim account of the discussions, testimonies, and legal arguments presented during the case.

Judgments and Orders: Iowa court records include judgments and orders issued by the court. These documents outline the court’s decisions, rulings, and directions regarding the case’s outcome and any legal remedies.

Appellate Records: If a case undergoes an appeal, the appellate records detail the arguments made on appeal and the decisions of the appellate courts.

Archival Importance: Iowa court records also hold archival importance, offering researchers and historians insights into legal history, societal changes, and the evolution of the legal system.

Iowa Court Records: A Tool for Research and Transparency

Iowa court records serve as a vital tool for legal professionals, researchers, journalists, and the general public. These records empower individuals to conduct thorough research, track legal proceedings, and ensure transparency within the state’s legal system. By utilizing effective search strategies and understanding the information within court records, individuals can navigate the complexities of the legal landscape and access valuable insights that contribute to a just and informed society. Whether for academic research, due diligence, or personal knowledge, Iowa court records are an indispensable resource that enriches our understanding of legal matters and their impact on society.


Iowa courts online are one location to which people may refer to find the Iowa court records which can be used to learn about a variety of different legal subjects. In this regard, the main location for Iowa courts online is at the web address of www.iowacourts.state.ia.us, which will require that the user, in the course of searching for Iowa court records, obtain official permission from the Government of the State to use it and retrieve documents.

In addition to Iowa court records which have been collected from the cases which have occurred in the past, locations for Iowa courts online can also be found which allow for people to search through the ongoing cases being decided through this judicial system.

To this end, the Iowacourts.state.ia.us site can allow people to search either the appellate, or appeals, Iowa court records being generated from ongoing processes. Both the Case Search and Advanced Case Search options on this element of the Iowa Courts online site can be used by general users.

The same is true specifically of the Case Search option for the other Iowa Court online system as is devoted to the subject of Trial Court proceedings. Similarly, a Payment Search function is also made accessible in order to access Iowa Court records through the website.

On the other hand, the advanced search function, as is also by the Iowa courts online, is only accessible if a user has been granted access to those particular Iowa court records.

If you need legal advice and assistance, contact Iowa lawyers.